Financials of Auditions for Current Season
Curious what others think about this topic, and whether it’s a fairly common practice or not:
I’ve seen a handful of auditions advertised for the current season (‘26-‘27) that are being held after the season has already begun. For tenure-track positions - and ignoring the issue of actually obtaining tenure - this seems like a slightly less substantial issue, as even if a winner joins a few months late, over the course of years with the ensemble the finances of a few months are arguably not very significant.
However, I’ve also seen this practice applied to temporary or one-year positions, often still advertised with the full-season base salary and schedule. This means that prospective candidates would be auditioning, then potentially relocating and beginning mid-season, for a position paying less than the advertised salary.
I can understand an orchestra wishing to fill seats for vacancies, but I wonder how many prospective…

I think most orchestra musicians would agree this is not ideal, obviously it’s better for everyone if the entire orchestra roster is filled before the season actually starts. But things like leaves of absence, retirements, medical leaves etc that are announced at the end of the prior season don’t allow time to fill those chairs before the next season begins.
It’s actually pretty commendable IMO if they hold 1-year audition right at the start of the season. Many groups just make 1-year appointments without auditions at all, because the logistics or finances preclude that option. Other groups will just float the whole season using subs, and not fill the position until they can hold a tenure-track round. This leaves the orchestra short staffed which reduces rotations and relief for the permanent players (while saving the orchestra $ on salary and benefits), so I can guarantee the players aren’t the ones who prefer that solution.